To the Editor:
I have read with interest the case report by Azem et al. (1), and congratulate them. However, several points need clarification:
Read the rest of this entry »
To the Editor:
I have read with interest the case report by Azem et al. (1), and congratulate them. However, several points need clarification:
Read the rest of this entry »
Johnson et al’s (1) efforts to rescue and utilize immature oocytes generated during ovarian stimulation cycles which would otherwise be wasted are commendable. This author’s experience in a similar endeavor (2) suggests that ovarian stimulation regimes may generate approximately 20% immature oocytes (1, 2), which is a significant loss if efforts are not made to rescue and utilize them. Read the rest of this entry »
To the Editor:
Jee et al. (1) report that in their hands a prematuration culture using a phosphodiesterase type 3 (PDE3) inhibitor does not improve developmental competence of immature oocytes. We and others previously reported a beneficial effect of this system (2-6). Fundamental differences in experimental design between their work and ours may explain this discrepancy. Read the rest of this entry »